Assignment - discussion Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

- discussion - Assignment Example nited States, Britain, and the Soviet Union found it hard to come to an agreement during meetings that summarized the ideologies of the post-war treaties (Snyder 121). In addition, these disagreements made it impossible for the leaders of these three nations to agree on the details of the Conference of Ministers. The three nations set up this meeting to settle on the post-second world war terms. Another reason for the Cold War was bitterness over history. The Soviet Union could easily overlook Britain and the United States’ intentions of putting an end to the Russian revolution in 1918. On the other hand, the United States and Britain could not overlook the fact that Stalin agreed to the 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact with the Nazis (Howard 83). This bitterness was part of the fundamental ideological gap amongst the three nations. In addition, the three nations supplied arms to the propaganda conflict that both sides declared against each other. The United States and Britain made up one side while the Soviet Union formed opposing one. The Soviet Union was a communist community governed by a tyrant who placed the needs of the nation before human rights. On the other hand, the United States was a capitalist nation that valued freedom, respected human rights, and was afraid of communism (Snyder 121). Capitalism and communism conflicted and were combative and imperialist respectively. The United States and the Soviet Union argued that the other idea was a threat to their nations and livelihoods. As a result the single way the world would be happy is either capitalism or communism prevailed worldwide (McDonough 71). The combination of these two philosophies and ways of life imposed fear and hostility amongst the residents of both nations. Tension arose in occupied Germany through a series of events. Against the Nazi background of primary differences in doctrines, goals, and historical bitterness, occupiers of Germany interfered with the alliance. As a result, the alliance

Otiz v. St. Peter's Case Study Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Otiz v. St. Peter's Case Study - Term Paper Example This will be helpful in warding off turf wars between services providers such as radiologists and cardiologists who may antagonize each other over the specialty that should be reading 64-slice CT angiograms and analyses. The corollary to this is that the partners must be sober when negotiating the contract. This vigilance will help maintain specificity in the scope of services more accurately. The scope should be accurate and broad enough to capture both ongoing and future services that are to be rendered. In this effect, it becomes obvious that Oltz was slighted since he had been delivering all his services. In this above wavelength, it is also important that the parties ensure that necessary resources needed to render the services are available. This will ward off the need to hire the services of a subspecialist, only a short while into the contract. It is also important that at this juncture, the vending company should negotiate with the healthcare institution on the right of first refusal. This will help protect the vendor’s exclusivity in its field of services delivery and specialty. It is most likely that Oltz was enjoying the right of first refusal and had ably been discharging his duties to the hospital until the physician anesthesiologists unfairly elbowed him out of operation. According to Devers (2003), the parties must also seriously moot termination issues. Termination issues are spelt in bond financing 501 (c) (3) and modify the terms, length and limits of an exclusive contract. Though the longest term of an exclusive contract is three years, the partners must ascertain whether the contract can be automatically renewed or not. In the event that this contract is nonrenewable, the partners will have to renegotiate on the contract’s expiry. St. Peter’s Community Hospital is culpable in this case since it neither considered the terms of the contract it had entered with Oltz, nor did it follow the contract termination process. Another important